Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 563

State v. Mills

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-09-16

Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Rush.

Relies on State v. Rush · State v. Pearson

Decided 1998-09-16

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
83 Ohio St.3d 111
.]




              THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MILLS, APPELLANT.
                       [Cite as State v. Mills, 
1998-Ohio-563
.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Rush.
   (No. 97-2290—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.)
      CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-97-012.
                                  __________________
        Alan R. Mayberry, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and Gary D.
Bishop, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        J. Scott Hicks, Wood County Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
        Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Jeffrey S. Sutton, State Solicitor,
and Simon B. Karas, Deputy Chief Counsel, urging affirmance for amicus curiae,
state of Ohio.
        Maureen O’Connor, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paul
Michael Maric, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus
curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Rush (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 53
, 
697 N.E.2d 634
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        RESNICK, J., not participating.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/563 · .json · Public domain