Criminal law—Where police officer stops vehicle based on probable cause that traffic violation has occurred, the stop is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILHELM, APPELLEE.
[Cite as State v. Wilhelm,
1998-Ohio-613
.]
Criminal law—Where police officer stops vehicle based on probable cause that
traffic violation has occurred, the stop is not unreasonable under the Fourth
Amendment to the United States Constitution.
(No. 97-1054—Submitted March 4, 1998—Decided April 22, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA96-12-272.
__________________
John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel
and Jeffrey P. Giuliano, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.
Fred Miller, for appellee.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
Dayton v. Erickson (1996),
.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals
for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Dayton v. Erickson (1996),