Loreto Dev. Co. v. Chardon

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




 LORETO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. VILLAGE OF
                                 CHARDON, APPELLEE.
               [Cite as Loreto Dev. Co. v. Chardon, 

.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
     (No. 96-2636—Submitted January 20, 1998—Decided March 11, 1998.)
   APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Geauga County, Nos. 95-G-1920 and
                                        95-G-1923.
                                  __________________
          Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co., L.P.A., Michael T. Gavin, Eli
Manos and Anthony J. Coyne; Eardley & Zulandt and David J. Eardley, for
appellants.
          Manley, Burke, Lipton & Cook and Gary E. Powell; and James M. Gillette,
Chardon Village Law Director, for appellee.
                                  __________________
          {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
allowed.
          MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ.,
concur.
          F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of
appeals.
          COOK, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
                                  __________________