Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 665

State v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-12-02

Certification of conflict allowed—Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment reversed on authority of State v. Cook—Trial court's finding that defendant is a sexual predator reinstated.

Relies on State v. Cook · State ex rel. Board of Education v. City of Youngstown

Decided 1998-12-02

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 51
.]




              THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WHITE, APPELLEE.
                       [Cite as State v. White, 
1998-Ohio-665
.]
Certification of conflict allowed—Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual
        predator—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of State v.
        Cook—Trial court’s finding that defendant is a sexual predator reinstated.
   (No. 98-1878—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.)
       CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-97-1279.
                                  __________________
        Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Craig T. Pearson,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The certified conflict is allowed.
        {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        {¶ 3} The trial court’s finding that James E. White is a sexual predator is
reinstated.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
        RESNICK, J., not participating.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/665 · .json · Public domain