Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Cause remanded to trial court to properly direct processing of the defendant.
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DULA, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Dula,
1998-Ohio-670
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Cause remanded to trial
court to properly direct processing of the defendant.
(No. 98-1427—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970504.
__________________
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E.
Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
W. Michael Kaiser, for appellant.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998),
.
{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the trial court to properly direct processing
of the defendant by the official in charge of the state correctional institution where
the defendant is committed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________