State v. Tennyson

Decided December 2, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-12-02

Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Court of appeals directed to lift stay of execution of sentence.

Relies on State v. Cook · State v. Shaffer

Decided 1998-12-02

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at

84 Ohio St.3d 49

.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TENNYSON, APPELLANT.
                     [Cite as State v. Tennyson,

1998-Ohio-680

.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Court of appeals directed
        to lift stay of execution of sentence.
   (No. 98-1127—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970445.
                                  __________________
        Jonathan P. Dameron, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998),

83 Ohio St.3d 404

700 N.E.2d 570

.
        {¶ 2} The court of appeals is directed to lift the stay of execution of
sentence.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________