Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 688

State v. Violette

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-11-25

Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.

Relies on State v. Cook · 84 Ohio St. 3d 28 - State v. Violette

Decided 1998-11-25

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 28
.]




           THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. VIOLETTE, APPELLANT.
                      [Cite as State v. Violette, 
1998-Ohio-688
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
   (No. 98-910—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
  APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APA09-1234.
                                  __________________
        Ronald J. O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L.
Taylor, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, and Allen V. Adair,
Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/688 · .json · Public domain