Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 692

State v. Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-11-25

Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Cause remanded to trial court to properly direct processing of defendant.

Relies on State v. Cook · State v. Lewis

Decided 1998-11-25

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 18
.]




              THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LEWIS, APPELLANT.
                       [Cite as State v. Lewis, 
1998-Ohio-692
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Cause remanded to trial
        court to properly direct processing of defendant.
   (No. 98-862—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970289.
                                  __________________
        Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sherry
Green, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and Robert L. Lane, Chief
Appellate Counsel, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        {¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the trial court to properly direct processing
of the defendant by the official in charge of the state correctional institution where
the defendant is committed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/692 · .json · Public domain