Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 694

State v. Marker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-11-25

Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court to conduct sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2) on authority of State v. Cook.

Relies on State v. Cook · State v. Marker

Decided 1998-11-25

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 19
.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MARKER, APPELLEE.
                      [Cite as State v. Marker, 
1998-Ohio-694
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court to conduct sexual
        predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2) on authority
        of State v. Cook.
    (No. 98-71—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
       APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Seneca County, No. 13-97-39.
                                  __________________
        Paul F. Kutscher, Jr., Seneca County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kenneth
H. Egbert, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
        Kent D. Nord, for appellee.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        {¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator
classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/694 · .json · Public domain