Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and trial court's finding that defendant is a sexual predator reinstated on authority of State v. Cook.
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at
84 Ohio St.3d 16
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. KIRKMAN, APPELLEE.
[Cite as State v. Kirkman,
1998-Ohio-695
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
judgment reversed and trial court’s finding that defendant is a sexual
predator reinstated on authority of State v. Cook.
(No. 98-687—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-97-69.
__________________
Jim Slagle, Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the trial court’s
finding that Donald Kirkman is a sexual predator is reinstated on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998),