Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 Ohio 695

State v. Kirkman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-11-25

Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and trial court's finding that defendant is a sexual predator reinstated on authority of State v. Cook.

Relies on State v. Cook · State v. Lacey

Decided 1998-11-25

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 16
.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. KIRKMAN, APPELLEE.
                     [Cite as State v. Kirkman, 
1998-Ohio-695
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment reversed and trial court’s finding that defendant is a sexual
        predator reinstated on authority of State v. Cook.
   (No. 98-687—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
       CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-97-69.
                                  __________________
        Jim Slagle, Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the trial court’s
finding that Donald Kirkman is a sexual predator is reinstated on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________

/1998/ohio/695 · .json · Public domain