State v. Bartis

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BARTIS, APPELLANT.
                       [Cite as State v. Bartis, 

.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
(Nos. 98-175 and 98-388—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25,
                                           1998.)
  APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No.
                                      97APA05-600.
                                  __________________
        Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Judith M. Stevenson, Franklin County Public Defender, and John W.
Keeling, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________