State v. Scarborough

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




        THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SCARBOROUGH, APPELLANT.
                   [Cite as State v. Scarborough, 

.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
   (No. 98-1015—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA97-08-088.
                                  __________________
        Timothy A. Oliver, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rachel A.
Hutzel, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Gray & Duning and Donald E. Oda II, for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 

, 

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________