Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OK 127 - Martin v. Johnson

Martin v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma City (2009), Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. (2007)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 28 state decisions

1701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital · TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell · Burk v. K-Mart Corp. · McGanty v. Staudenraus · Mason v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an employee acts in bad faith and contrary to the interests of the employer in tampering with a third party's contract with the employer we can divine no reason that the employee should be exempt from a tort claim for interference with contract.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We agree that the dismissal order was unappealable at the time of adjudication, because it disposed of only one of the many claims pled. However, when this Court reviews a judgment upon appeal it may reverse, vacate or modify any intermediate order involving the merits of the action, or any portion thereof. Intermediate or interlocutory orders anterior to judgment may thus be reviewed on appeal from the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In lieu of or in addition to the orders provided for in this paragraph, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising the party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other cireumstances make an award of expenses unjust.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.