Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OKCIVAPP 17 - Manning v. Brannon

Manning v. Brannon’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Dressel · Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc. · Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc. · 168 Cal. App. 3d 333 - Hulsey v. Elsinore Parachute Center · Fretwell v. Protection Alarm Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so long as (1) the intent to excuse one party from the consequences of his or her own negligence is expressed in clear, definite and unambiguous language, (2) the agreement was made at arm’s length with no vast disparity of bargaining power between the parties, and (3) the exculpation is not contrary to ^statute or public policy, such a waiver or release from liability is valid and enforceable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is sufficient to relieve Shangri-La of liability. However, Manning holds as follows: T7 The Oklahoma Supreme Court has long recognized that exculpatory contracts, Le., a contract to avoid liability for damages also known as a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “describe the nature and extent of damages from which”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.