Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OK CR 17 - Gilbert v. State

1998 OK CR 17 - Gilbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Simmons v. South Carolina · Calder v. Job · Kachina Plywood, Inc. v. Hurt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “post-conviction petitioners are apparently now to bear the procedural penalties wrought by a fairly persuasive past understanding by direct appeal attorneys that extra record materials, and investigation which might produce such materials, were not welcome on direct appeal. Such an understanding clearly reflected the law governing direct appeals at the time Petitioner's counsel filed his brief in the instant case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.