Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1998 OK CR 22

Hooper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1998-04-03

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2002

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relies on Conover v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LANE, Judge,

¶1concur in results:

¶2¶ 1 I concur in results by reason of stare decisis. I maintain my disagreement with the majority in its interpretation of the new post-conviction relief statute as I expressed in Conover v. State, 1997 OK CR 39, 942 P.2d 229,234-35(Lane, J., concur in result).

/1998/okcr/22 · .json · Public domain