State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2026
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Halper · Hudson v. United States · State v. Robinson · State v. Hammond · Ellis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he State can only bring this appeal if it is authorized by one of the limited instances listed in Section 1053 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes. This statutory authority cannot be enlarged by construction.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“in the following cases and no other: . . . (4) Upon judgment for the defendant on a motion to quash for insufficient evidence in a felony matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“1. Upon judgment for the defendant on quashing or setting aside an indictment or information;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.