Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OKCR 53 - Howell v. State

Howell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2013

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Enmund v. Florida · Oregon v. Kennedy · Tison v. Arizona · Simmons v. South Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the extent of voir dire is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.