Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OKCR 63 - Slaughter v. State

Slaughter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2014

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

90199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Enmund v. Florida · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Propositions II and IV, [Petitioner] argues he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel . . . . Despite the procedural bar of res judicata, a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel can be brought for the first time on post-conviction, but only if it requires fact-finding outside of the direct appeal record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.