Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1998 OKCR 7 - Hemphill v. State

Hemphill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2024

11 state decisions

801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00) · Degraffenreid v. State · State ex rel. Murphy v. Wolfer · 69 Okla. Crim. 204 - Ex Parte Denton · Harris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our state's sentencing statutes contemplate that when a defendant is sentenced he receives only one sentence, not multiple ones. The suspension order is not a separate sentence but is instead a condition placed upon the execution of the sentence .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Just as a defendant's suspended sentence may not be lengthened by intervening revocation orders occurring within the original term of sentence, a suspended sentence may not be shortened by intervening revocations. So long as there remains an unrevoked portion of the suspended sentence, the district court's power and authority to revoke all or part of it does not end until the expiration of the original term of sentence. The original term of sentence is that which is set by the district court at the time the order suspending was first entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.