Juttelstad v. Juttelstad’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2012
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Petition of Famous Brands, Inc. · Dahn v. Trownsell · Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. Lyon · Sporleder v. Van Liere · Himrich v. Carpenter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may enter an order allocating the reasonable child care expenses for the child, which are due to employment of either parent, job search of either parent, or the training or education of either parent necessary to obtain a job or enhance earning potential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Jacobsen“according to [their] accepted usage and a strained, unpractical, or absurd result should be avoided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Enrichment is unjust if it is a result of money paid by mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.