State v. Christensen’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. · United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. Needham · United States v. Linn · State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not the proper function of this [C]ourt to resolve evidentiary conflicts to determine the credibility of witnesses or weigh the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holzer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.