State v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Martinmaas v. Engelmann (2000), State v. Chipps (2016)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. Oklahoma · State v. Goodroad · State v. Collins · State v. Thompson · 212 Pa. Super. 208 - Commonwealth v. Clowser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to constitute the crime, the question is whether there is sufficient evidence in the record which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holzer · State v. Perovich“`The test is not whether we would have made the same ruling, but whether we believe a judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances, could have reasonably reached the same conclusion.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“are presumed correct and are reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Litschewski · State v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.