Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 MASSAPPDIV 276 - Chiappetta v. Lyons

Chiappetta v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 216

Relies on Linthicum v. Archambault · Perry v. Hanover · Liberatore v. Town of Framingham · Mello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. · Stella v. Curtis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both the language of the statute and its underlying Legislative intent indicate that an award of treble damages is mandatory upon any finding of a failure to have paid wages in violation of §148. ... [A] mandatory award [is] consonant with the general purpose of multiple damages provisions by which the Legislature has traditionally ‘declared its displeasure with the described acts, sought to deter their commission and encouraged vindictive lawsuits if wrongdoing was not stemmed.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A mandatory award of treble damages under G.L.c. 149, §150 obviously serves the salutary purposes of deterring employers from taking advantage of their employees and of compensating employees for the time during which they have been deprived of their earned wages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.