Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 ME 104 - Nadeau v. Pitman

Nadeau v. Pitman’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2025

5 district · 3 state decisions

501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paffhausen v. Balano · June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc. · Bouchard v. Blunt · Miller v. Lentine · Dufort v. Bangs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The remedy of unjust enrichment describes recovery for the value of the benefit retained when there is no contractual relationship, but when, on the grounds of fairness and justice, the law compels performance of a legal and moral duty to pay. The existence of a contractual relationship precludes recovery on a theory of unjust enrichment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Events which occur subsequent to execution of a contract and are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of the contract, are not a mutual mistake rendering a contract unenforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.