Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 MT 147 - State v. Caekaert

State v. Caekaert’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Meader · State v. Baisch · 18 Wash. App. 727 - State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accused maintains control or a right to control the contraband; possession may be imputed when the contraband is found in a place which is immediately and exclusively accessible to the accused and subject to his dominion and control, or to the joint dominion and control of the accused and another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is the knowing control of anything for a sufficient time to be able to terminate control. Section 45-2-101(59), MCA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “satisfied that the conduct of the probationer is not what he agreed it would be when he was given liberty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.