State v. Waters’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Adams v. State (2007), State v. Kroll (2004)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky · Linkletter v. Walker · United States v. Johnson · Montana v. Egelhoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. The defendant shall conduct himself in a law-abiding manner and shall not violate any law of the United States or of the State of Montana or any other state, or the ordinance of any city or town of this State or any other state during said term. 6. The defendant is hereby required to submit to reasonable searches of his person, vehicle, or premises whenever requested to do so by his Probation Officer or by a Law Enforcement Officer at the direction of his Probation Officer. The purpose of these searches is to help the defendant in his rehabilitation. 8. The defendant shall not own, possess, or be in control of any firearms or deadly weapons, including black powder, as defined by State or Federal Law. 13. The defendant shall secure and maintain full-time, legitimate employment and defendant shall participate in any educational or vocational training programs as directed by his Supervising Officer and shall not terminate such programs without prior approval from his Supervising Officer. 14. The defendant shall have no contact with the victim(s) and/or the family of this criminal cause in any manner: in person, by telephone, personal and/or third party, computer generated or in writing. 20. The defendant shall pay a supervision fee to the Clerk of District Court pursuant to § 46-23-1031, MCA....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kroll“which impose[d] an inquiry, multifactored or otherwise, into whether a new judicial rule of criminal procedure is to be applied retroactively or prospectively to a similarly situated criminal defendant whose case is pending on direct review or not yet final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Giddings“where . . . a defendant was clearly put on notice of sentencing conditions and given a sufficient opportunity to respond to those conditions and ask for clarification, that defendant should not be heard to complain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Humphrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.