Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 MT 260 - State v. Beavers

State v. Beavers’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
2
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably State v. Price (2006), State v. Lindberg (2008)

73 state decisions

5501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Iannelli v. United States · Crist v. Bretz · Keeble v. United States · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A criminal defendant is entitled to jury instructions that cover an issue or theory if there is evidence to support such an instruction. It is fundamental under Montana law that "a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense when one of the parties requests it and the record contains evidence from which the jury could rationally find the defendant guilty of the lesser offense and acquit of the greater."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “evidence to be admitted regarding the circumstances, facts, and declarations which grow out of the main fact, which are contemporaneous with it and serve to illustrate its character.... This evidentiary doctrine allows the jury to consider evidence which tends to explain circumstances surrounding the charged offense as relevant, probative and competent and as part of the same litigated event.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.