Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 MT 38 - State v. Roach

State v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2023

10 state decisions

601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bowley · State v. Radi · State v. Sheppard · Benjamin v. McCormick · State v. Latray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Before or during trial, a plea of guilty may be accepted when: (a) subject to the provisions of subsection (3), the defendant enters a plea of guilty in open court; and (b) the court has informed the defendant of the consequences of the plea and of the maximum penalty provided by law that may be imposed upon acceptance of the plea. (2) At any time before or after judgment, the court may, for good cause shown, permit the plea of guilty to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty substituted. (3) For the purposes of this section, in cases in which the defendant is charged with a misdemeanor offense, an entry of a plea of guilty through the use of two-way electronic audio-video communication [may be] considered to be an entry of a plea of guilty in open court. Audio-video communication may be used if neither party objects and the court agrees to its use. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.