Stanley v. Holms’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bruner v. Yellowstone County · Sprunk v. First Bank System · Litten v. Jonathan Logan, Inc. · J.L. v. Kienenberger · Hoven v. First Bank (NA)-Billings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a representation; (2) its falsity; (3) its materiality; (4) the speaker’s knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth; (5) the speaker’s intent that it should be acted upon by the person and in the manner reasonably contemplated; (6) the hearer’s ignorance of its falsity; (7) the hearer’s reliance upon its truth; (8) the right of the hearer to rely upon it; (9) the hearer’s consequent and proximate injury or damage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A claim of economic duress requires a showing that the contract at issue was made under circumstances evincing a lack of free will on the part of the contracting parties. It is not sufficient to show that consent was secured by the pressure of financial circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the burden then shifts to the non-moving party to prove, by more than mere denial and speculation, that a genuine issue does exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.