State v. Redcrow’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Root (2003), State v. Abe (2001)
68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schlup v. Delo · Sawyer v. Whitley · State v. Perry · State v. Baker · State v. Gollehon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A claim that alleges the existence of newly discovered evidence that, if proved and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole would establish that the petitioner did not engage in the criminal conduct for which the petitioner was convicted, may be raised in a petition filed within 1 year of the date on which the conviction becomes final or the date on which the petitioner discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the existence of the evidence, whichever is later.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Raugust v. State · Pena v. State“jurisdictional limit on litigation and its waiver may only be justified by a clear file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-242%20Opinion.htm (5 of 6)3/29/2007 10:45:53 AM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/99-242%20Opinion.htm miscarriage of justice, one so obvious that the judgment is rendered a complete nullity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. K. Martell · Pena v. State“(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a petition for the relief referred to in 46-21-101 may be filed at any time within 1 year of the date that the conviction becomes final. A conviction becomes final for purposes of this chapter when: (a) the time for appeal to the Montana supreme court expires; (b) if an appeal is taken to the Montana supreme court, the time for petitioning the United States supreme court for review expires; or (c) if review is sought in the United States supreme court, on the date that that court issues its final order in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Abe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.