Schneider v. Schaaf’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Ges, Inc. v. Corbitt (2001), WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLC (2007)
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Griffin v. Breckenridge · United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. Scott · Rager v. McCloskey · Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier · Olson v. Fraase
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]eceit require[s] misrepresentation of facts, suppression of facts, misleading another, or promising without intending to perform.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Not all losses resulting from a fraudulently induced contract will be recoverable in an action for deceit. Losses brought about by other factors unrelated to the misrepresentation or nondisclosure do not afford a basis for recovery. ... Only the damage which is proximately caused by the specific misrepresentation or nondisclosure will be recoverable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A trial court abuses its discretion if it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner, if its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination, or if it misinterprets or misapplies the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.