State v. DeCoteau’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably City of Jamestown v. Jerome (2002), State v. Graf (2006)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Payton v. New York · Ornelas v. United States · Cady v. Dombrowski · Welsh v. Wisconsin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A de novo standard of review is applied to the ultimate determination of whether the facts constitute exigent circumstances....” [United States v. Cooper, 168 F.3d 336 ,] 339 [ (8th Cir.1999) ]. This is similar to our review of probable cause. See State v. Kitchen, 1997 ND 241, ¶¶ 12-13 , 572 N.W.2d 106 (we defer to a trial court’s findings of fact in the disposition of a motion to suppress, but whether findings of fact meet a legal standard is a question of law which .is fully reviewable).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Karna · State v. Huber“A district court's findings of fact on a motion to suppress will not be reversed if there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the court's findings, and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morales · State v. Wills“(1) the characteristics and condition of the accused at the time of the consent, and (2) the details of the setting in which the consent was obtained.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bartelson · State v. Hayes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.