Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 ND 95 - Goff v. Goff

Goff v. Goff’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2024

20 state decisions

1301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stout v. Stout · Hawkinson v. Hawkinson · Botnen v. Lukens · Keller v. Keller · Paulson v. Bauske

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e will reverse if the trial court's analysis fails to give sufficient credence to the need for keeping the custodial family intact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “After receiving evidence of an extensive, but unfruitful, job search in the Fargo Moorhead area, we do not believe it reasonable for a trial court to suggest a custodial parent must seek employment that would involve a daily commute outside of the community where the parent and children reside. The failure to seek a job that requires such commuting is not appropriate evidence of lack of a good faith effort to find employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Distance alone is not a sufficient basis to deny relocation; it must be considered in the context of the ability to refashion a visitation schedule that can foster the noncustodial parent/child relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.