Larson v. Hetland’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fortier v. Traynor · Larsen v. Zarrett · Heimer v. Privratsky · Ellefson v. Earnshaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny action . . . against a physician . . . based upon professional negligence is dismissible on motion unless the claimant has obtained an admissible expert opinion . . . within three months of the commencement of the action or at such later date as set by the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“greater leniency for the plaintiff who is subject to a motion for dismissal under 28-01-46 may be required than is typically given under either [evidentiary-abuse-of-discretion or summary judgment's genuine-issue-of-material-fact] standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was `designed simply to minimize frivolous [malpractice] claims' by requiring the plaintiff to obtain an expert opinion supporting [his claims] during [the] early stages of [ ] litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.