In Re Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · White v. Stump · Walker v. Mather · Young v. Adler · In the Matter of Ronald and Marjorie Pattersons Appeal of Abbotsford State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Except as otherwise provided in this title and notwithstanding subsection B of this section, the following property shall be reserved to every person residing in the state, exempt from attachment or execution and every other species of forced sale for the payment of debts, except as herein provided: [[Image here]] 21. Such person’s interest in a claim for personal bodily injury, death or workers’ compensation claim, for a net amount not in excess of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,-000.00), but not including any claim for exemplary or punitive damages;.... [Emphasis added].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. Laubach“[EJven potential recoveries for a workers’ compensation claim and for a personal injury action were items of the bankruptcy estate for which the debtor could claim exemptions.” [Emphasis added].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. Laubach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.