Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 Pa. Super. 143 - Filter v. McCabe

1999 Pa. Super. 143 - Filter v. McCabe’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hamil v. Bashline · Greenberg v. Aetna Insurance · Werner v. Zazyczny · American Housing Trust, III v. Jones · J.E.J. v. Tri-County Big Bros./Big Sisters, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to determine whether the trial court properly sustained Appellee’s preliminary objections, this court must consider as true all of the well-pleaded material facts set forth in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts. Pa.R.C.P. 1028(c) provides that if an issue of fact is raised in preliminary objections, the trial court shall consider evidence “by depositions or otherwise.” In conducting our appellate review, we observe that preliminary objections, the end result of which would be dismissal of the action, may be properly sustained by the trial court only if the case is free and clear of doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “One who, being under no duty to do so takes charge of another who is helpless to adequately aid or protect himself is subject to liability to the other for any bodily harm caused by him by (a) the failure of the actor to exercise reasonable care to secure the safety of the other while within the actors charge; (b) the actor’s discontinuing his aid or protection, if by doing so he leaves the other in a worse position than when the actor took charge of him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.