Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 Pa. Super. 236 - Commonwealth v. Harmon

1999 Pa. Super. 236 - Commonwealth v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2011

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

120199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan v. Leckie Smokeless Coal Co. · Commonwealth v. Lantzy · Mordan v. United States · Commonwealth v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ordinarily, absent extraordinary circumstances, the failure to file a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence amounts to waiver of any claim which could have been raised in such an appeal, thereby precluding collateral relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The PCRA Court's determination of credibility is supported by the record, and therefore we will not disturb it on appeal. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a direct appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “before a court will find ineffectiveness of counsel for failing to file a direct appeal, Appellant must prove that he requested an appeal and that counsel disregarded this request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.