1999 Pa. Super. 5 - Commonwealth v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2022
1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3052
Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico Insurance · Spring Garden Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia · In re Accreditation of the Commercial Law League of America · Commonwealth v. Corley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing an order granting a suppression motion, we must consider only the evidence of the defendant’s witnesses and so much of the evidence of the prosecution as, read in the context of the record as a whole, remains uncontra-dicted. If the evidence of record supports the trial court’s findings, then an appellate court is bound by those findings and may reverse only if the legal conclusions drawn from them are erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even if the officer acts in good faith or the police officer's actions would have been lawful if performed within the proper jurisdictional limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.