Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 SD 123 - Frigaard v. Seffens

Frigaard v. Seffens’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Montana v. United States · Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc. · Tesch v. Tesch · Bank of Hoven v. Rausch · Risse v. Meeks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [t]he issue decided in the prior adjudication was identical with the one presented in the action in question; (2) [t]here was a final judgment on the merits; (3) [t]he party against whom the plea is asserted was a party or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication; and (4) [t]he party against whom the plea is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.