Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 SD 13 - Samuelson v. Jorgenson

Samuelson v. Jorgenson’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2016

4 state decisions

20199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wagner v. Truesdell · Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. Marsden · Estate of Billings v. Deadwood Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses · Holmes v. Miller · Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Hughes County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An attempt to commence an action is deemed equivalent to the commencement thereof when the summons is delivered, with the intent that it shall be actually served, to the sheriff or other officer of the county in which the defendants or one of them, usually or last resided ... Such an attempt must be followed by the ... service thereof, within sixty days, (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We need not determine whether the rule of substantial compliance recently articulated in Wagner applies, because this is a case of strict rather than substantial compliance with a statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sheriffs of counties containing municipalities that extend into more than one county are officers of each concerned county for purposes of serving process under SDCL 15-2-31.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.