Dooley v. Dooley’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lien v. Lien · Paul v. Paul · Holforty v. Holforty · Prentice v. Prentice · Pellegrin v. Pellegrin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we reverse the award of attorney's fees ... and remand the matter to the trial court in order to admit [ ] prior itemized attorney's fee statements into evidence and determine a reasonable fee based upon them and the itemized statement already received.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficient information upon which to conclude that an award of [attorney fees] was reasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.