Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 SD 68 - Bradley v. Weber

Bradley v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Thompson v. Keohane · State v. Pellegrino · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Whether the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person of the defendant; 2. whether the sentence was authorized by law; and 3. whether an incarcerated defendant has been deprived of basic constitutional rights. 3”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Further, there is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance falls within the wide range of professional assistance and the reasonableness of counsel’s performance is to be evaluated from counsel’s perspective at the time of the alleged error and in light of all the circumstances and the standard of review is highly deferential. The petitioner must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a defendant has received ineffective assistance of counsel is essentially a mixed question of law and fact. In the absence of a clearly erroneous determination by the circuit court, we must defer to its findings on such primary facts regarding what defense counsel did or did not do in preparation for trial and in his presentation of the defense at trial. This [C]ourt, however, may substitute its own judgment for that of the circuit court as to whether defense counsel’s actions or inactions constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.