State v. Walton’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2024
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Delaware v. Fensterer · Hervey v. Shalala · Spence v. Johnson · State v. Jacob
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““do ‘not require a strict policy of bringing every charge before the juvenile court for its approval. The juvenile court is to make the judicial determination of whether a juvenile should remain within the province of the juvenile court and not determine what charges the State can file.’ ” Walton, 600 N.W.2d at 533 (S.D.1999) (quoting Randolph, 876 P.2d at 180-81 (Kan.App.1994)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Day“the trial court retains broad discretion concerning the limitation of cross-examination and it will be reversed only when there is a clear abuse of that discretion and a showing of prejudice to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“`they give a full and correct statement of the law applicable to the case.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Charles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.