State v. Gehm’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ackermann v. United States · Henderson v. Brown · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the evidence was undiscovered by the movant at the time of trial; (2) that the evidence is material and not merely cumulative or impeaching; (3) that it would probably result in acquittal; and, (4) that no lack of diligence caused the movant to discover the evidence sooner.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Strahl · State v. Condon“Whether a new trial should be granted is left to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and this Court will not disturb the trial court’s decision absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion. If the trial court finds an injustice has been done by the jury’s verdict, the remedy lies in granting a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Strahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.