State v. Jaeger’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Kohl (2000), State v. Stanley (2001)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crane v. Kentucky · State v. Dunn · State v. Bishop · State v. Thomas · State v. Knight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny alleged inaccuracies in the [PSI], which have not been resolved by the parties and the department prior to sentencing, shall be brought to the attention of the sentencing judge.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kohl · State v. Vict. Asta“requires the sentencing judge to consider the party's objections to the report, make findings on the record as to whether the information objected to is accurate, and determine on the record whether that information is relevant to the issue of sentencing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'requires not just bald citation to authority but development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.