Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UT 108 - State v. Redd

State v. Redd’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Hamilton · Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort · Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc. · Alta Industries, Ltd. v. Hurst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “look to the consequences of those readings to determine the meaning to be given the statute.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Adams v. Swensen · Commonwealth Property Advocates, LLC v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
  2. “[T]his court has a long history of relying on dictionary definitions to determine plain meaning.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. State · Cook v. Department of Commerce
  3. “); Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort, 808 P.2d 1037 , 1045 n. 39 (Utah 1991) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnership · Manzanares v. Byington

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.