Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1999 UT 40 - State v. Lovell

State v. Lovell’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Menzies v. Galetka (2006), Archuleta v. Galetka (2011)

35 state decisions

1801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Faretta v. California · Holloway v. Arkansas · Von Moltke v. Gillies · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tlo warrant substitution of counsel, a defendant must show good cause, such as a conflict of interest, a complete breakdown in communication or an irreconcilable conflict which leads to an apparently unjust verdict.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “make some reasonable, non-suggestive efforts to determine the nature of the defendant's complaints”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To show that the alleged conflict adversely affected trial counsel's performance, Defendant must establish that '(1) other counsel likely would have approached the case differently and (2) a tactical reason other than the alleged conflict [did not] exist[ ] for [counsel's] decisions.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.