State v. Call’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “implicate the due process concerns expressed in State v. Call, 1999 UT 42, ¶ 11 , 980 P.2d 201 ("[If it is the intent of the State to extend the probationary period beyond its original term, the State must take definitive action to extend the term before the expiration date, and the probationer must be given notice of that intent. Otherwise, the probationer is left in a state of uncertainty, not knowing whether to continue to observe the terms of his probation.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Orr · State v. Orr

2. “The running of the probation period is tolled upon the filing of a violation report with the court alleging a violation of the terms and conditions of probation or upon the issuance of an order to show cause or warrant by the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Orr

3. “willing to accept the extension of his probation without a hearing and acknowledged his right to be present at a hearing and to be represented by counsel;”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Pacheco