State v. Bakalov’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), State v. Calliham (2002)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in context of the arguments advanced by both sides as well as in context of all the evidence.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Redcap · State v. Ringstad“However, a prosecutor may draw permissible deductions from the evidence and make assertions about what the jury may reasonably conclude from those deductions.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Redcap · State v. Davis“a prosecutor engages in misconduct when he or she expresses personal opinion or asserts personal knowledge of the facts.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Redcap · State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.